Ma. Loumena A. Candelaria
Andres Bonifacio College
LLB-I
LAND TRANSPORTATION OFFICE
G.R. No. 131512 January 20, 2000
LAND TRANSPORTATION OFFICE [LTO], represented by Assistant Secretary Manuel F. Bruan, LTO Regional Office, Region X represented by its Regional Director, Timoteo A. Garcia; and LTO Butuan represented by Rosita G. Sadiaga, its Registrar, petitioners,
vs.
CITY OF BUTUAN, represented in this case by Democrito D. Plaza II, City Mayor, respondents
LAND TRANSPORTATION OFFICE [LTO], represented by Assistant Secretary Manuel F. Bruan, LTO Regional Office, Region X represented by its Regional Director, Timoteo A. Garcia; and LTO Butuan represented by Rosita G. Sadiaga, its Registrar, petitioners,
vs.
CITY OF BUTUAN, represented in this case by Democrito D. Plaza II, City Mayor, respondents
FACTS:
The Sangguniang Panglungsod (SP) of
Butuan on August 16, 1992 passed an ordinance entitled “An Ordinance Regulating the Operation of Tricycles for hire, providing
mechanism for the issuance of Franchise, Registration and Permit,
and imposing Penalties for Violations thereof and for other purposes.” The ordinance provided for, among other
things, the payment of franchise fees, fees for registration of the
vehicle, and fees for the issuance of a permit for the driving thereof.
The City of Butuan asserts that Sec. 129
and Sec.133 of the Local Government Code is their basis for said
ordinance and that, said provisions authorize LGUs to collect registration fees
or charges along with, in its view, the corresponding issuance of all kinds of
licenses or permits for the driving of tricycles.
LTO explains that one of the
functions of the National Government, that , indeed has been transferred to
LGUs is the franchising authority over tricycles-for-hire of the LTFRB but
NOT the authority of the LTO to register all motor vehicles and to issue
to qualified persons of licenses to drive such vehicles.
The RTC of Butuan decreed an
issuance of a PERMANENT WRIT OF INJUCTION against LTO prohibiting and enjoining
LTO, as well as its employees and other persons acting in its behalf, from (a)
registering tricycles and (b) issuing licenses to tricycle drivers. The CA
sustained the trial court’s decision.
The adverse rulings of both Courts
prompted the LTO to file an instant petition for review on certiorari to annul
and set aside the earlier Court decisions.
ISSUE:
HELD:
No, said powers [to register and issue licenses] remain under LTO’s exclusive jurisdiction
The registration and licensing functions are vested in the LTO (pursuant to
Art. 3 Sec.4 (d) [1], 10 of RA 4136-Land Transportation and Traffic Code) while
franchising and regulatory responsibilities are vested in the LTFRB (Land
Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board; pursuant to EO # 202 ). Under the Local Government
Code (specifically Sec. 458 (8)(3)(VI)),
the Local Government Units now have the power to REGULATE (to fix, establish or control, to adjust by
rule, method or establish mode to direct by rule or restriction; or to subject
to governing principles or laws) the operation of tricycles for hire and
grant franchises thereof but they are still subject to the guidelines
prescribed by the DOTC (Department of Transportation and Communications;
under Article 458(a) [3-VI] of the RA 7160).
.
No comments:
Post a Comment