Tuesday, May 11, 2021

DIGEST/ MAWILE/ Frivaldo v. COMELEC

                                                 Frivaldo v. COMELEC

G.R. No. 120295, June 28, 1996

 

FACTS:

Juan G. Frivaldo ran for Governor of Sorsogon again and won. Raul R. Lee questioned his citizenship. He then petitioned for repatriation under Presidential Decree No. 725 and was able to take his oath of allegiance as a Philippine citizen.

However, on the day that he got his citizenship, the Court had already ruled based on his previous attempts to run as governor and acquire citizenship, and had proclaimed Lee, who got the second highest number of votes, as the newly elect Governor of Sorsogon.

ISSUE:

Whether Frivaldo’s repatriation was valid.

RULING:

The court ruled that his repatriation was valid and legal and because of the curative nature of Presidential Decree No. 725, his repatriation retroacted to the date of the filing of his application to run for governor. The steps to reacquire Philippine citizenship by repatriation under the Presidential Decree No. 725 are:

(1) filing the application;

(2) action by committee; and

(3) taking the oath of allegiance if the application is approved.

 

It is only upon taking the oath of allegiance that the applicant is deemed ipso jure to have reacquired Philippine citizenship. If the decree has intended the oath taking to retroact to the date of the filing of the application, then it should not have explicitly provided otherwise. He is therefore qualified to be proclaimed governor of Sorogon.


                                                                        Case Digest by: Vanessa R. Mawile

No comments:

IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COLUMNS OF MR. AMADO P. MACASAET PUBLISHED IN MALAYA DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 19, 20 AND 21, 2007. D E C I S I O N

  Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC A.M. No. 07-09-13-SC             August 8, 2008 IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS ...