- The Latin phrase nemo tenetur seipsum accusare means roughly “no man has to accuse himself.” It is the basis of our rights against self incrimination and forced inculpation. It protects against three practical problems associated with confessions: (1) untrustworthy confessions; (2) involuntary confessions; and (3) confessions provoked through unacceptable force. This article argues that the Nemo tenetur principle was intended primarily to avoid the third problem: confessions obtained through improper methods. It examines the arguments for and against justifying the principle as a protection against either untrustworthy or involuntary confessions. The article also develops a framework to aid in the identification of improper methods of interrogation. Finally, it concludes by applying this framework to three hypothetical cases and arguing that only confessions obtained through unacceptable force should be barred.
Tuesday, October 20, 2020
THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COLUMNS OF MR. AMADO P. MACASAET PUBLISHED IN MALAYA DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 19, 20 AND 21, 2007. D E C I S I O N
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC A.M. No. 07-09-13-SC August 8, 2008 IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS ...
-
THIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 191894 July 15, 2015 DANILO A. DUNCANO, Petitioner, vs. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN (2nd DIVISION), and ...
-
EN BANC [ G.R. No. 190293, March 20, 2012 ] PHILIP SIGFRID A. FORTUN AND ALBERT LEE G. ANGELES, PETITIONERS, V...
-
There are primary rights which must be respected even in proceedings of this character: (1) The first of these rights is the right to a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment