1. Section 21 or RA 9165 is provision for the chain of custody of
seized items from the conduct of buy-bust operation. It is necessary in order
to maintain the integrity of the seized items from seizing officer to the
chemistry examination up to presentation of such in the court.
2. A. Yes. They cannot be charge two different offense in one act.
though either of the both could be charge against respondent but it should be
indicated relatively to one another.
B. The ordinance is Constitutional because it does not contravene to
constitution and or any statute. However in order for the ordinance to be valid
it should be; 1. Must not contravene the constitution or any statute. 2. Must
not be unfair or oppressive; 3. Must not be partial and discriminatory; 4. Must
not prohibits but regulate trde;5 must be general and consistent with public
policy and 6. Must be reasonable.
C. because the prosecutor did not push through with the case related
to the ordinance.
D. it cannot be considered as free speech based on the provision of
criminal law but a violation of ordinace which prohibits obscene and
pornographic materials publication and selling as such.
3. Juan could invoke section 2 of the article III, …against
unreasonable search and seizure….xxxx. base on the given facts, it cannot be
considered as infragrante delicto, since the alleged shabu was not seen in
plain view. therefore, the search made could be considered as illegal.
4. A. NO. because it is already a law, therefore it already pass the
constitutionality test prior its passage.
No. because bill of attainder
is an act of
a legislature declaring a person, or a group of persons, guilty of some crime,
and punishing them, often without a trial. Constitutional presumption means,
presumed innocent unless proven otherwise.
NO.
B. res inter alios
acta rule provides
that the rights of a party cannot be prejudiced by an act, declaration, or
omission of another.
Cruel and Unusual Punishment,refers to punishment that is too severe
for the crime committed. Ex. Tortures, deliberately degrading and other form of
cruelty. Reclusion perpetua cannot be considered as cruel punishment.
5. A. Buy-bust-an
undercover operation by law enforcers to catch suspecting drug dealers.
B. Chain of Custody- the
order in which items of evidence have been handled during the investigation of
a case to maintain the integrity of the evidence b y ensuring that it is not
tampered and contaminated.
C. Insulating witness. Mandatory witness required by law, especially
in drug operation, during inventory, marking, photograph of seized items in
order to ensure no planting and switching of evidence recovered from the
suspect possession and property.
D. Section 5, of RA 9165 penalizes
sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and
transportation of all kinds of dangerous drugs.
E. Section 11 of RA9165 is the Possession
of Dangerous Drugs.
F. Strict Neutrality v Benevolent
Neutrality . the latter refer to principle that the free exercise and the establishment
clauses "should be.while the former is religious accommodation.
G.Millers test on obsnenity
includes,1. appeal to prurient
interest,2,whether, it depicts or describe in a potently offensive way and
sexual conduct and whether the work taken as whole for lack of literacy,
artiditic, politicalm and scientific.
6. 1. None. Because it is two separate act
that constitutes two separate offense.
Yes. He can be convicted in both offense
under PD 1866
2. Agote Principle this is relation to RA
8294,this principle explains that when unlicensed firearms was used in the
commission of an offense, there can be no separate offense of simple illehgal
posseion of firerms in the crime against prrson, it only become as
aggravating circumstance. Therefore this
principle could apply in the instant case.
7. The Ordinance is Valid. Because it is both
under the applicable laws and the constitution. Furthermore, one of the
devolved power of the LGC on the devolution of enforcement fisheries laws in
the municipal waters including its conservation and protection.
8. No it is null and without force and effects
due to the reason the city council has no power to eliminates criminal
liability of those squatters who illegally constructs their house in public
land, thus relinquish the criminal liability of those people who will be clothe
by the ordinance.
9. Both house in Makati and Ichon,
Macrohon, Southern Leyte, but for the purpose of election, the former is his
residence. Residence is used to indicate a place of abode, whether permanent or
temporary. While domicile denotes fixed permanent residence to which when
absent, one has the intention to return.
10. Both ordinance are invalid. Gambling in not
illegal, nor it is stipulated in the constitution that it is illegal. Although
it is lay upon the discretion of the legislature on how to regulate and
prohibit others forms. But prohibiting all forms of gambling even it is allowed
by special law and regulated by the PAGCOR as the lead agency of the government
to supervise and regulate the operation, could constitute violation of special
law. Thus once it is contrary to existing laws, the said ordinance would be
invalid.
No comments:
Post a Comment