all speech are not treated the same. Some types of speech may be subjected to some regulation by the State under its pervasive police power, in order that it may not be injurious to the equal right of others or those of the community or society.43 The difference in treatment is expected because the relevant interests of one type of speech, e.g., political speech, may vary from those of another, e.g., obscene speech. Distinctions have therefore been made in the treatment, analysis, and evaluation of the permissible scope of restrictions on various categories of speech. 44 We have ruled, for example, that in our jurisdiction slander or libel, lewd and obscene speech, as well as "fighting words" are not entitled to constitutional protection and may be penalized
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COLUMNS OF MR. AMADO P. MACASAET PUBLISHED IN MALAYA DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 19, 20 AND 21, 2007. D E C I S I O N
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC A.M. No. 07-09-13-SC August 8, 2008 IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS ...
-
THIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 191894 July 15, 2015 DANILO A. DUNCANO, Petitioner, vs. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN (2nd DIVISION), and ...
-
EN BANC [ G.R. No. 190293, March 20, 2012 ] PHILIP SIGFRID A. FORTUN AND ALBERT LEE G. ANGELES, PETITIONERS, V...
-
There are primary rights which must be respected even in proceedings of this character: (1) The first of these rights is the right to a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment